
WHO STARTED SWING?
‘Cuban Natives, Not Jelly-Roll Morton Or Handy, Started Jazz in 1712’
Malcolm-Smith Cites History Books to Show Swing’s Origin
By George Malcolm-Smith A curious fact about This Thing Called Swing is that, despite a fast-mounting bibliography on the subject, none of its historians has made any serious attempt to trace its origin.
With a vague allusion to the Congo, they seem content to let the question rest. Now that’s hardly the right attitude, for the origin of any art or enterprise is always the most engrossing part of its history. Who started a thing, and when and where and how are all questions to keep an army of scholars constantly digging into dusty tomes throughout the world.
God knows this correspondent should be the last to assume a pedantic pose, but he has been nursing a notion regarding the origin of jazz for some time, and he’d like to express it, if only for the sake of argument. Jazz Goes ’Way Back Let’s follow the down beat with a foolproof premise, then improvise from that point. The premise is that jazz was introduced into the states through New Orleans. Nobody can dispute that, for it is a fact that the Delta was ringing with jazz music as far back as the ’eighties. The famed literateur, Lafcadio Hearn, as long ago as 1885, wrote of the existence in New Orleans of “a music of a rudimentary syncopated type known as jazz.” We know also that Stale Bread LaComb and his troupe of white boys were featured to in the joints of New Orleans’ Storeyville (Storyville) in the ’nineties, when they were billed as “That Razzy, Jazzy Spasm Band.” And we know, too, that such pioneers as Buddy Bolden, Freddie Keppard and Jelly Roll Morton were giving out hot licks before the turn of the century. We know still further that New Orleans cradled the very greatest of hot virtuosi, including, in addition to those mentioned, such men as Oliver, Armstrong, Mutt Carey, Bechet, Red Allen, Johnny Dodds, Mannone, Bauduc, Froeba, Bonano, Prima, Celestin, Piron, and the Original Dixieland Jazz Bands of both Tom Brown and Nick LaRocca.
Of only two things can we be absolutely certain regarding jazz music: It was introduced to this country through New Orleans, and it was introduced to New Orleans by the Negroes. Swing in 1712 Now, according to all available history, the first blacks to arrive in the Louisiana settlement were brought there in 1712 by Antoine Crozat, a French banker who was a moving spirit in the notorious Mississippi Bubble. It is more than likely that most of these came from Cuba, where the African slave trade had existed since 1523, scarcely 30 years after Cuba’s discovery by Columbus. Here in Cuba, the Negroes’ instinctive sense of rhythm would naturally have combined with the musical talents of their Spanish captors, creating a new style of music. It is a matter of record that in the years of 1809 and 1810, more than 3,000 of these Cuban Negroes were brought into New Orleans. It is safe to assume that they brought with them this strange new Africo-Spanish music.  To clinch the argument with academic authority, Professor Charles Morrison Patterson, psychologist who apparently had studied the hot idiom, said in the late ’teens of this century, “This thing called jazz has existed in Cuba and Haiti for hundreds of years.” Dolly Sisters Were Hep! While much of the foregoing is admittedly mere conjecture, here is an historic fact: The first music to hit Broadway that anywhere near resembled jazz came directly from Cuba. And it came even before the Original Dixieland Jazz Band first blared into the canyons of Manhattan in 1916.
Here’s the story: In 1913, the famous Dolly Sisters — Jancai and Roszika, former “Follies” dancers who now are married into European nobility — made a professional tour of Cuba. There they were struck with the vivacious, teasing qualities of a certain type of music played by the Cuban Negroes. The intensely rhythmic melodies of this music spurred the Dolly[’]s to dance as they had never danced before. On their return to New York, where they were booked for Ziegfeld’s “Midnight Frolic” on the New Amsterdam Roof, they tried to describe the music to the great showman. Sensing a novelty for his forthcoming production, Ziegfeld called in composers and musicians of all nationalities, but not one could identify or reproduce the exotic rhythms and harmonies described by Jancai and Roszika. At length and as a last resort, Ziegfeld arranged with the Victor company to have a record made “on location” in Cuba. Thus, “The Midnight Frolic” in 1913 opened with the Dolly Sisters dancing to a gramophone platter, the machine being concealed behind a backdrop. On that platter, Broadway was served its first taste of jazz! Conga Is Old Stuff To bolster Cuba’s claim to being the birthplace of swing, consider the article recently published in DOWN BEAT under the byline of Jerry Shelton. Jerry gives a graphic description of a Conga jamboree, a Cuban dance revived last year after having been banned 14 years. The Conga, known in Cuba for countless generations, involves a sort of musical battle-royal which is almost certainly the precursor of the carving contests that used to be waged between rival bands in the streets of New Orleans.
In these columns recently appeared an amusing though caustic controversy on the question of who deserves the title of the Columbus of Jazz. The rival claimants, you remember, were Jelly Roll Morton and W. C. Handy. We think that an impartial judge, knowing the facts, would order both gentlemen out of court, for the truth is, both men, whether they know it or not, are indebted for any claim to distinction they may possess to the Island of Cuba. Jelly Roll’s music, learned in New Orleans, originated among the Negroes who generations ago brought it with them when they crossed the Gulf. W. C. Handy simply committed this music to paper. Indeed, Handy wrote St Louis Blues, his masterpiece, shortly after a tour of Cuba with a minstrel troupe, and you will observe that it has an unmistakably Spanish flavor. That strangely familiar rhythm you hear of African blues is, of all things, a Spanish tango!
Of course we may be mistaken.
|